Before this 7 days, I discovered that my Galaxy S9+ overview unit experienced an OTA update out there. This update resolved some stability challenges with the camera and set the cellphone on the latest protection patch (which is surely a great issue). But at practically 250MB, it was really a sizable update, far too, and so set up took a little bit to complete – my cellphone was out of commission for more than five minutes.

es file explorer file manager

Actually, nevertheless, it should not have been. Android introduced a element called seamless updates as aspect of the 7. Nougat release… in 2016. Google’s Pixel phones ended up the to start with to ship with it later that 12 months. But it’s now 2018, and the Galaxy S9 and S9+ ship with Android 8. Oreo. They even now you should not have seamless updates.

If you’re not common, seamless updates (also identified as A/B updates) enable an OS update to your cellphone to put in in the history while you’re even now utilizing it. At the time the update has been accomplished – once again, all in the history – you simply just reboot your unit (which properly takes no longer than a usual reboot) and you’re off and operating.

The issue is this: seamless updates can just take a procedure that easily meant five minutes of difficult downtime for your cellphone – or considerably longer for a key update – and reduce it to significantly less than 30 seconds. With several Android phones now receiving protection patches on a month-to-month foundation, this is a key advantage, and 1 that takes a ton of the suffering out of the updating procedure.

The trouble is that several producers, Samsung involved, even now aren’t adopting it. The causes for this are almost certainly several. For 1, applying seamless updates calls for a elementary set of alterations to Android’s traditional storage partitioning method, a little something that distributors are likely loathe to offer with. And a 2nd drawback comes in the form of utilizing far more storage space, considering the fact that seamless updates demand that you in essence have two occasions of the OS set up on the unit (“A” and “B” photographs).

Whatsoever Samsung’s reasoning is – be it a simple deficiency of will or panic consumers will not likely like obtaining marginally significantly less usable storage on their phones – this is a little bit preposterous. The benefits of seamless updates are really evident, and with protection far more and far more a issue on our cellular units, making confident customers aren’t keeping away from updating their phones due to the fact of the time the procedure takes must be a issue producers and carriers are getting very seriously. Google has provided a element that properly would make updating your cellphone painless. Samsung has experienced properly more than a 12 months to adopt it, and almost certainly a good two many years of detect that this modify was coming.

It can be a very little sad, but Google will likely have to make seamless updates required ahead of several OEMs will comply and put into action them, inspite of the evident person working experience benefits. Samsung must be accomplishing this on its have – not waiting around for Google to [probably inevitably] set a deadline.

We achieved out to Samsung for an explanation, and will update this article if we receive a reply.

Samsung declined to remark on this story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: